Uncategorized

[20FA] HPA 520, Section 001: Int Hlth Srv Org (WC, Jones)AssignmentsL04 Assignment: Health Care Disparities Press Conference (Individual)

Rubric

Presentation Rubric
Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Style

5 pts

Advancing
• Engages the audience • Uses storytelling or other methods to connect the audience with the material • Holds the audience’s attention • Responds with poise, accuracy, and knowledgeably to spontaneous questions and is not flustered

4 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Engages the audience for part of the time • Uses storytelling but could be more effective • Holds the audience’s attention for part of the time • Responds with poise, accuracy, and knowledgeably to spontaneous questions with some difficulty

2 pts

Needs Development
• Lacks engagement with the audience • Does not use storytelling or other methods to connect the audience with the material • The audience is uninterested and not connected to presenter or material • Has difficulty responding to spontaneous questions and is immediately flustered
5 pts
Eye contact, Body Language, Poise

5 pts

Advancing
• Held the attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. • Movements seem fluid and help the audience visualize. No fidgeting • Student displayed a relaxed, self-confident nature about self, with no mistakes.

4 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes often enough to distract the audience. • Made movements or gestures that enhance articulation. May have some fidgeting. • Made minor mistakes, but quickly recovered from them well; displayed little or no tension

2 pts

Needs Development
• Displayed minimal eye contact with the audience, while reading mostly from the notes • Too many movements or gestures and/or fidgeting that distracted from the presentation • Displayed mild tension or anxiousness that made it difficult to follow the presentation; had trouble recovering from mistakes.
5 pts
Elocution

Pitch, Volume – Just right/too loud/too soft, Clear enunciation

10 pts

Advancing
• Student used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms in an appropriate volume • Perfect fluency with complete sentences, with no filled pauses (uh, like, well, okay?)

8 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Voice was clear most of the time • Most words pronounced correctly • Fluency is intermittent • Used filler words (uh, like, well, okay)

4 pts

Needs Development
• Voice was muffled, hesitant, and/or difficult to understand • Terms were pronounced incorrectly • Fluency was choppy and stunted • Used many filler words to distraction (uh, like, well, okay)
10 pts
Organization

Orderliness, clear purpose & identification of topics. Flows well.

5 pts

Advancing
• The purpose and topics to be addressed for the presentation are clear and easy to understand. • The presentation flows well from one topic to another with transitions.

4 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Topics and purpose are less clear and left to interpretation • The flow of the presentation is scattered, inconsistent, choppy, or difficult to follow at times

2 pts

Needs Development
• Topics and purpose were confusing • Flow was confusing and impacted the presenters ability to gain audience attention/buy-in or understanding
5 pts
Analytical thinking skills

Ability to categorize issues; ability to identify problems and appropriate solutions

10 pts

Advancing
• Student completed research and was able to synthesize that information into a cohesive plan/set of recommendations or conclusions • Interprets information accurately and appropriately

8 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Research was lacking so that it was difficult to understand the conclusions/recommendation etc. • Synthesis – partially able to pull the information together • Student presents information accurately and appropriately with only minor inconsistencies, irrelevancies, or omissions.

4 pts

Needs Development
• Poor research into the topic • Lacked a cohesive understanding and presentation of the facts/issues/plan • Unable to interpret the information and draw conclusions or make recommendations – items are inaccurate or inappropriate.
10 pts
Persuasion / Translational Skills

10 pts

Advancing
• Identified the audience’s interests, needs, and level of understanding. Uses understanding to tailor presentation content, structure, and length. • Presentation style, language, research, delivery, and ability to translate information to an audience allowed the audience to support, believe, understand, and be willing to adopt the solutions/suggestions • Uses effective audiovisual media that tells the story they are attempting to relay in a way that is clear. Uses innovative ways to accomplish the presentation outcome.

8 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Presentation style, language, research, delivery, and ability to translate information to an audience allowed the audience to MODERATELY support, believe, understand, and be willing to adopt the solutions/suggestions.

4 pts

Needs Development
• Presentation style, language, research, delivery, and ability to translate information to an audience allowed the audience to MINIMALLY OR NOT support, believe, understand, and be willing to adopt the solutions/suggestions
10 pts
Style Communication of Message

5 pts

Advancing
• Expertly provided a presentation that made it clear what solution was needed. The presentation took the audience on a journey that connected well and clearly articulated the process and particulars of the solution. The communication left almost nothing to doubt and few questions about its merit.

4 pts

Intermediate / Evolving
• Presentation provided significantly solid rationales for the decision making. The “story” or solution was presented in a way that was easy to follow, left some questions but overall made it easy to interpret how the ideas could be implemented.

2 pts

Needs Development
• The presentation lacked a connected message. It did not allow the audience to see the ways in which the solution would be actionable. It left many questions unanswered or not fully answered and demonstrated a lack of rationales for decision making.
5 pts
Total Points: 50
“NEED HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT? TALK TO US. OUR WRITERS CAN HELP!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *