write two 250 words peer review evaluation, all i need is reasonable answer in 1 hour

Can you think of anything else that might improve this feature of the composition?
Scholarly Debate/Opposition: Is there effective, believable and thoughtful engagement with resistance to the central claims of and/or evidence used in the composition? How might you improve this feature of the composition?
Using Sources: Do you provide clear context/summary/introduction of your scholarly source material? Is the quoted material relevant and insightful? Is the material that makes a claim or draws a conclusion properly contextualized? Do you effectively evaluate your source material by describing your own position on the topic/problem within that ‘conversation’? How might you improve these features of the composition?
Style/Organization
Does the composition follow a line of development from beginning to end? How might you organize the essay differently?
How does this essay conclude? Does it end with new insights, point to advocacy, or is it merely a repetition of what you have already encountered? How can you improve the essay’s conclusion?
Multi-modality:
Does the essay effectively make use of epigraphs, footnotes, pull quotes, images, photography, original documents, art, maps, graphs, and/or video? Are these carefully selected, arranged and various? Is the image too melodramatic or ‘obvious’ in its message? Too vague? Does the image advance the power or force of the argument? How?
Does each multi-modal element have a caption in MLA formatting explaining what it is?
Mechanics:
Are the sources MLA formatted both in-text and in a works cited page? (please consult OWL for MLA formatting instructions!)
How is the grammar? When you read your sentences back to yourself, can you understand them? Do all of the subjects and verbs agree? Is your punctuation in the right place? Are proper nouns (laws, governmental departments, cities) capitalized correctly?
a link to the drafts
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bNh2jdEuOvPbTn…